Subject	yeah, basicly the same thing as I linked to in my post...
Posted by	Snoguitar on February 21, 2004 at 6:19 AM
	This message has been viewed 36 times.
In Reply To	Or....the gentleman who has done my alignments for 17 years. posted by kentatwater on February 21, 2004 at 05:37 AM
Message	It's what was used for many years (before the days of computer/laser alignments. It's about 20times more accurate than the toy MikeH seems to swear by. wannabe genic sig:
Follow Ups	If you want a cheap accurate tool to check your camber - AzHeat 01:03:33 02/21/04 I got one for $9 at Ace... - Snoguitar 02:54:08 02/21/04 Accurate within .5 of a degree. If you consider that - AzHeat 13:30:42 02/21/04 Site for DIY caster /camber they use - AzHeat 03:33:33 02/21/04 Or....the gentleman who has done my alignments for 17 years. - kentatwater 05:37:25 02/21/04 The success of this method is a level platform to >>> - ZUL8TR 06:12:47 02/21/04 yeah, basicly the same thing as I linked to in my post... - Snoguitar 06:19:51 02/21/04 Stock car racing use the same "Toy" (linky) - AzHeat 11:37:37 02/21/04 Looks like he's using a bubble gauge to me... - Snoguitar 15:52:27 02/21/04 He is using both type of guages. What is your point? - AzHeat 16:33:48 02/21/04 both tools bubble and center weight needle are using gravity - AzHeat 11:45:36 02/21/04 The radius of the gauge is gonna determine accuracy... - Snoguitar 15:46:36 02/21/04 What do you mean my radius? The needle guagea has to - AzHeat 16:43:23 02/21/04 Arc of the gauge... - Snoguitar 05:27:01 02/22/04 I understood that part the larger the circle the - AzHeat 11:00:07 02/22/04 You've got that backwards... - Snoguitar 17:02:03 02/22/04 I meant if you are off by fraction of a millimeter on - AzHeat 18:07:01 02/22/04 And that's why a gauge with a larger radius is more accurate (n/m) - Snoguitar 18:47:35 02/22/04 With a 3' construction level i can get .1 deg (n/m) - The-FActor 09:56:07 02/21/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.